skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Owen, A B"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Summary Estimation of crossed random effects models commonly incurs computational costs that grow faster than linearly in the sample size $ N $, often as fast as $$ \Omega(N^{3/2}) $$, making them unsuitable for large datasets. For non-Gaussian responses, integrating out the random effects to obtain a marginal likelihood poses significant challenges, especially for high-dimensional integrals for which the Laplace approximation may not be accurate. In this article we develop a composite likelihood approach to probit models that replaces the crossed random effects model with some hierarchical models that require only one-dimensional integrals. We show how to consistently estimate the crossed effects model parameters from the hierarchical model fits. We find that the computation scales linearly in the sample size. The method is illustrated by applying it to approximately five million observations from Stitch Fix, where the crossed effects formulation would require an integral of dimension larger than $$ 700\,000 $$. 
    more » « less